Text Only
Diary

« The Kosovo front

Main

Depravity watch »



 
March 24, 2004
The death of liberalism

Victor Davis Hanson has written a tremendous eulogy for liberalism, whose attrition has turned the values of the western world upside down. He has understood something I realised years ago (as I described in 'Why I Am A Progressive' and many other writings) -- that authentic liberal values have been corupted and all but destroyed by the left. They have also hijacked debate by purporting to be liberal themselves, when in fact they have replaced these values by monumental illiberalism -- indeed a totalitarian mindset. And it is these 'illiberals' who, under the banner of liberalism, antiracism and all the other twisted epithets of false virtue in which they clothe themselves, are now leading the pack in hatred against Israel and the Jews. As Hanson writes:

'And then I grew old, and learned that it wasn't any more reactionary men of the soil who evoked the Jews to explain why they were not listened to, or felt weak, or were frustrated, but rather often very liberal, and self-acclaimed progressives. Instead of Shylock fruit merchants, the new sneaky Jew was the neoconservative—with a funny-sounding name like Wolfowitz or Perle who, due to some sinister genius, had hoodwinked red-blooded Americans into fighting and dying for the Likud party in Israel. Not 9-11, not Saddam Hussein's horrific record of genocide, not some systematic effort to end rogue states and terrorist havens, and not an idealism to bring consensual government to the landscape of the Middle East explained why we went to Iraq. No, it was once again the Jews.

'When I was young, my mother and father also lectured me about the paranoid style in American politics. “There will always be someone like a McCarthy waving papers and shouting conspiracies,” they preached. At the time, inasmuch as they were agrarian conservative Democrats in a sea of reactionary Republicans, I think they were telling me to watch out for phraseology from our politicians like “cooked up,” “treason,” “traitor”-and especially to be on the look-out when they screamed and frothed, and made all sorts of scary allusions like “some leaders have told me in private” or “the greatest example of (fill in the purported travesty) in American history.” And then I grew old and listened to Howard Dean quote al Qaeda's about killing Spaniards as proof of our blunders and ponder the “theory” that George Bush knew in advance of 9-11; and Ted Kennedy refer to cabalistic meetings in Texas; and Al Gore scream, veins bulging and hair tossed, about the administration's treasonous war; and the Democratic National Chairman alleging that a President was AWOL while in the military; and John Kerry hinting at unnamed foreign leaders contacting him in secret—the conspiracists Chomsky, Gore Vidal, or Michael Moore no doubt all grinning off-stage.

'When I was young, my father used to get me out of bed, in a thick John Kennedy accent, and with perfect Bostonian mimicry order me to start the day with “viga.” I think he meant “vigor” in the sense of the new Kennedesque idealism at home and abroad. My isolationist grandfather would sigh and concede that Harry Truman was right after all, in spending all our hard-earned tax dollars in strange places like Greece and Turkey and sending relatives and friends to worse in Korea. There was a sort of guarded idealism of the need to promote democratic values, coupled with the tragic acceptance that such sacrifice would always be misinterpreted and caricatured. But the idea, my grandfather also added, was to make places abroad a little freer so Americans would not have to be attacked here at home by those who hated us. And then I grew old and learned that somehow Iraq was not like Panama, or Serbia, or Afghanistan, where without the UN, Congressional approval, and mostly alone we took out dictators and theocrats and left the foundations of democracy in their place. Instead, something that made no real sense in terms of classical economic exploitation was said to be about “blood for oil,” or promotion of the Likud party in Israel, or creating a new empire in the Middle East—all this about a country that we debated publicly a long time about invading, went to the UN, got congressional sanction, and toppled its dictator in three weeks, and then stayed on for another year to ensure the Iraqis had a chance for the only freedom in the Arab Middle East.

'The world has changed. What was once liberal is now illiberal, and the old progressivism has become mean-spirited and opportunistic. What was once idealistic is seen as calculating. When I read about the “Jews” now, it is almost always negative and emanates either from the European left or the so-called liberal university here in the United States. Israel, still democratic and still attacked by autocracies, is now hated rather than respected, not for what it has done, but for what it is. The world snored, for example, this week when suicide bombers were foiled in their attempts at getting at a chemical weapons dump so that they might once more gas Jews. Neither Kofi Annan nor Desmond Tutu, for all their recent media appearances, said a word when Palestinians apologized for murdering a jogger in Jerusalem on the mistaken impression that the poor Arab was a “Jew.”

'When I turn on the TV and see some wild-eyed crazy-like public figure ranting, it is not a John Bircher frothing about pure drinking water and statesmen of dual loyalties, but prominent Democratic politicians like an Al Gore or Howard Dean screaming to the point of exhaustion, alluding to the end of America as we have known it, and citing a “betrayal” of the United States. Secret meetings, stealthy friendships, and contorted past relationships—the purported exegesis of all this intrigue and plotting now comes out on NPR and in the New York Review of Books, not garish 1950 pulp newspapers printed in pink.

'When I listen to those who talk of race first rather than last, and identify themselves and others by their skin color, it is almost always by those on the Left, and usually by those who have something to gain by claiming first loyalty to a race or tribe rather than to a common humanity. And when I hear America criticized for being too wasteful in its largess, too naive in its foreign policy, too extended abroad, too simplistic in its support of democracy, it is now always from a Democratic Senator or liberal professor, almost never from the old America Firster or pull-in-our horns Isolationist.

'I don't know quite how they did it, but the Democrats' candidate looks as at home snowboarding at a ritzy ski resort as George Bush does at a NASCAR rally. And when I hear anti-Semitism, hatred of Israel, warning about Jews in government, fury about foreign aid, visceral hatred and rude exclamations, sinister conspiracy theories, and racial separatism it usually has come far more often from someone on the Left than Right and from one educated and affluent rather than poor and ignorant.'

How they did it? Ah yes, that really is the question that hangs in the air. But the fact is, it has been done. The centre of gravity in the west has quite simply shifted sharply to the left, so that anyone trying to hold the line for authentic liberal values is demonised as being of the right or even the far right. The true nature of what is happening is thus obscured by the successful hijacking of debate and the marginalisation and vilification of any opposition being mounted by liberal defenders. What they are defending is the basis of western civilisation, which rests on a set of moral precepts which, in turn, rest on a culture which, after being attacked and eroded for decades, is now teetering at the edge of nihilism and social suicide. Thus a civilisation is weakened from within at the very moment it is being attacked from without.

The centrality of Israel and the Jews in the current convulsions of the world is surely no accident. The Jews have always been society's pit canaries -- their fate presages what lies in store for everyone else. Western liberalism was the product of many influences, but these all rested ultimately on the fundamental insights of Judaism -- that individual behaviour had to be constrained by the discipline of moral laws, and that all mankind was equal because it was created in the image of God. It is that cultural edifice, overlaid, amplified and developed by the tenets of Christianity, which gave rise to western civilisation and the liberal values that animate it and have created progress and modernity -- a civilisation whose fundamentals have been under relentless and increasingly successful attack for decades by the wreckers of the left, and whose existence is now targeted for annihilation by the Islamic jihad.

History tells us that decadent cultures which have lost the will to fight do not survive. But then, the internal culture war has ensured that history has been all but killed off in Britain. QED. And RIP to liberalism.

Posted by melanie at March 24, 2004