Published in: Daily Mail
The great grand-daddy of the man-made global warming scam, the fifth horseman of the eco-apocalypse James Lovelock, has now recanted. Well, sort of. Don’t get too excited.
Lovelock now admits to having been ‘alarmist’ about climate change, and says other fanatics environmental commentators such as Al Gore were too alarmist as well.
You don’t say.
It’s only taken a quarter of a century. During that time, Professor Lovelock was the guru of man-made global warming theory. More than that, he was the prophet of a cult which turned the earth into a kind of god -- or more specifically a goddess called Gaia, investing it with anthropomorphic characteristics while his disciples demonised the human race itself as the destroyers of the planet.
Lovelock made one chilling prediction of planetary doom after another. In 2006, he warned that the earth might soon pass
‘“into a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years....as the century progresses, the temperature will rise 8 degrees centigrade in temperate regions and 5 degrees in the tropics. Much of the tropical land mass will become scrub and desert... Before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.”’
Now, however, MSNBC reports Lovelock as saying:
‘“The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened.
‘“The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,” he said. “The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time… it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising -- carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that,” he added.’
Indeed, there is no question about it. Not being able to tell what the climate is actually doing, let alone what it will do in the future, is in essence what climate sceptics have been saying consistently for the past 25 years or so. And so presumably we should now count Lovelock as one of their number? Er, not exactly:
‘Lovelock told msnbc.com: “It depends what you mean by a skeptic. I’m not a denier.”’
Good Lord, perish the thought! ‘Climate change deniers’ are nasty, vicious, imbecilic, rapacious neo-Nazis, aren’t they? No, Lovelock’s latest position is... ah, as sophisticated and, um, nuanced as we would expect from someone with such a solid and distinguished scientific track record:
‘He said he still thought that climate change was happening, but that its effects would be felt farther in the future than he previously thought. “We will have global warming, but it’s been deferred a bit,” Lovelock said.’
Of course! Even though
“we don’t know what the climate is doing”
“there’s nothing much really happening yet”
“it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising”
--- in other words, there is no evidence whatsoever to support the theory of man-made global warming, its baleful effects have only
“been deferred a bit”.
Isn’t the environmental movement wonderful? Even when they admit they’re totally wrong, they still insist they were right all along.
Professor Lovelock is a Fellow of the Royal Society. Some years back that august body, the embodiment of the scientific establishment and the custodians of scientific integrity, told us that on man-made global warming ‘the science is settled’. What will the Society now be saying to Professor Lovelock FRS, or he to it?
Meanwhile, although on April 4 it was reported that
‘David Cameron is set to end his long silence on green issues, with a major speech in front of the world’s key energy and climate figures’,
and that according to climate change minister Greg Barker this would be
“a major policy intervention by the Prime Minister... a major keynote on the green economy’,
it was reported yesterday
‘David Cameron is no longer making a pro-environmental oration on Thursday during a gathering of 23 energy ministers from around the world’
because according to Number 10:
‘...while Cameron may have mulled a set-piece speech it was only ever considered’ (hat tip: Benny Peiser).
Ah. Might the Prime Minister finally have detected that the winds of climate change are being blown somewhat off course – and the reputations of all who promoted this, the greatest anti-scientific scam of all time, now risk being blown away with it?
Too late. The planet won't fry, but the warmists are toast.